Graphic created using Canva for Education

Grammarly, a resource to help students identify grammatical errors and improve their writing skills, has served as an accessible and effective way to strengthen communication, primarily in academic settings. However, in February of the 2026 school year, students were surprised to discover that the platform, one that many had previously been encouraged to use, was suddenly removed from school-issued Chromebooks.

The decision to get rid of Grammarly came without clear communication, almost as if something was going on behind the scenes that no one knew about. Most students, and even the majority of teachers, were unaware that such a ban was going to take place. The abruptness of the removal made it a central topic of conversation throughout the school. Students expressed a wide range of reactions, though frustration appeared to be the most common response. In a survey promoted by the journalism staff, approximately 73.8% of the 106 student responses reported that they used Grammarly regularly, highlighting just how significant the platform had become in supporting students’ learning.

When asked about their opinions on the removal, many students voiced concerns not only about the loss of a helpful tool, but also about the reasoning behind the decision, about which they were not told much. One recurring point of confusion centered on the role of artificial intelligence, or AI. Some students questioned why Grammarly was removed due to its integration of AI features, while other AI-based tools, such as ChatGPT, remain accessible on school devices. This inconsistency has led students to question the criteria used to determine which technologies — if any — are acceptable and which are not.

Concerns about fairness have emerged. Some students pointed out what they perceive as a double standard: Teachers are often allowed to use AI tools for tasks such as grading, lesson planning or content creation, while students may face disciplinary consequences for using similar technology. This discrepancy raises broader questions about equality within the educational environment. If AI tools are considered valuable and efficient for educators, should students also not be allowed to benefit from them in a guided and responsible way?

At the same time, it is important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding Grammarly’s evolution. As the platform has expanded to include more advanced AI capabilities, concerns about academic integrity have increased. These features can, in some cases, be misused, for example, by generating written responses or providing answers in ways that can bypass the learning process on homework or assignments. Such concerns are valid and reflect the broader challenges schools face as technology continues to advance.

However, the removal of Grammarly altogether may not be the most effective solution. Rather than eliminating the tool, some argue that schools should focus on teaching students how to use it responsibly. By setting clear guidelines and expectations, educators could help students distinguish between using AI as a support tool and relying on it in ways that undermine their learning.

Ultimately, the situation raises important questions about communication, consistency and the role of technology in education. The sudden removal of a widely used resource, without clear explanation or discussion, has left many students feeling confused and unheard. Moving forward, an easier approach — one that includes student input and emphasizes responsible use — may lead to more balanced and effective outcomes.